|
Cook
Inletkeeper Watershed Watch
The
Cook Inlet Beluga Whale
April 2010:
Inletkeeper debates industry over Beluga whale
January 2010:
TWO
WAYS YOU CAN HELP THE COOK INLET BELUGA WHALE!
BACKGROUND:
After
years of foot-dragging, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
finally listed the beleaguered Cook Inlet Beluga whale under the
Endangered Species Act in October 2008. Now, NMFS is holding
public hearings (see schedule below) and taking comments until
March 3, 2010 on a proposed rule to establish the Critical
Habitat Area needed to help the beluga recover to a healthy
population size.
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?
The Cook Inlet beluga is genetically distinct and geographically isolated
from other beluga stocks in Alaska. Scientists estimate that
roughly 1300 belugas inhabited Cook Inlet as recently as the
1980’s. Today, NMFS estimates 321 whales remain, down from 375
individuals in 2008. Unregulated subsistence harvests likely
caused their decline, but little information exists to explain
why the whale population has not rebounded since unregulated
harvests stopped. Opponents of beluga whale protections
complain industry will be harmed, but responsible development
and critical habitat protection can and must go hand in hand.
The beluga whale is a vital thread in the complex ecological
fabric of Cook Inlet, and its survival is essential for a
functional ecosystem and the many economies it supports. As a
result, it’s important to protect the whale’s critical habitat,
and to conduct additional research, to give the Cook Inlet
beluga whale a fighting chance.
MAKE TIME TO ATTEND A PUBLIC
MEETING!
·
Soldotna:
February 3, 6:00-9:00
PM, Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly Chambers, 144 N. Binkley
Street
·
Homer:
February 4, 6:00-9:00 PM, Alaska
Islands and Ocean Visitor Center, 95 Sterling Highway #1
·
Wasilla:
February 11, 6:00-9:00 PM, Best
Western, Lake Lucille Inn, Iditarod Room, 1300 West Lake Lucille
Drive
·
Anchorage:
February 12,
6:00-9:00 PM, Loussac Public Library, Wilda Marston Room, 3600
Denali Street
SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS BY
MARCH 3, 2010!
See
suggested talking points below. Comments may be sent to (make
sure to reference rulemaking no. RIN 0648-AX50):
Mail:
Kaja Brix, Assistant Regional Administrator, Protected
Resources, Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802-1668
Web:
http://www.regulations.gov (Reference RIN 0648-AX50)
Fax: 907.586.7557
NMFS
PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT
The map
below shows the proposed Critical Habitat. The proposed rule for
Cook Inlet beluga whale critical habitat areas is located
here.

TALKING POINTS:
·
NMFS’s proposed
rule relies on the best available science to identify the
physical, chemical and biological factors needed to identify
critical habitat for the Cook Inlet beluga whale. Now NMFS must
move quickly to develop and implement a recovery plan to give
the beluga whale a fighting chance.
·
NMFS’s proposed
rule identifies two distinct critical habitat areas (i.e. Areas
1 & 2). Yet as NMFS’s Conservation Plan notes, both areas are
important habitat for the beluga whale. Science and law require
both areas to be protected, and NMFS should clearly include
these areas in the final critical habitat rule.
·
All upriver areas
where belugas have been known to feed should be included in the
critical habitat area, as should all upriver areas supporting
beluga prey habitat, because they are “essential for
conservation.” There are substantial benefits for protecting
these habitats and the vital economies they support.
·
The critical
habitat designation will not hamper responsible development.
Based on tens of thousands of reviews across the nation on
development projects in areas containing endangered species,
less than 1% of projects are significantly curtailed, because
responsible development and endangered species protection can
and do go hand in hand (see support memo
here).
·
NMFS should not
exclude any areas from the critical habitat area simply because
powerful interests request such exclusions. NMFS’s own analyses
show that mitigation costs are relatively low compared to the
benefits of a viable, healthy beluga whale population.
MORE INFORMATION:
National Marine Fisheries Service
Alaska Center for the Environment
Audubon Alaska
Cook Inletkeeper
Center for Biological Diversity
Defenders of Wildlife
Natural Resources Defense Council
Ocean Conservancy
If you have any questions,
contact Cook Inletkeeper: 907.235.4068 x22 or
keeper@inletkeeper.org.
-- ### --
Alaska Center for the
Environment ·
Center for Biological Diversity
Cook Inletkeeper
·
North Gulf Oceanic Society
Natural Resources Defense
Council
PRESS
RELEASE
(PDF Version)
For Immediate Release: December
1, 2009
For More Information:
Craig Matkin,
NGOS: 907.299.0677
Brendan
Cummings, CBD:760.366.2232 x304
Bob
Shavelson, CIK: 907.299.3277
Cook
Inlet Beluga Whale to Gain Habitat Protection
Proposal Relies on Science
Over Politics to Protect 3,000 Square Miles as Critical Habitat for
Endangered White Whale
ANCHORAGE, AK –
The federal National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) today took
an important step toward protecting critical habitat under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the Cook Inlet beluga whale in
Alaska by proposing to designate more than 3,000 square miles of
the imperiled whale’s habitat for protection. The overdue
proposal comes after a 2007 petition by various local and
national groups to NMFS to list the beluga under the ESA, and on
the heels of a formal notice of intent to sue by the Center for
Biological Diversity.
Once habitat is designated, federal agencies are prohibited
from taking any actions that may “adversely modify” it. Species
for which critical habitat has been designated have been found
to be more than twice as likely to be recovering, and less than
half as likely to be declining, as those without it.
“NMFS has clearly relied on the best available science to
identify and designate the habitat needed to give the Cook Inlet
beluga whale a fighting chance at survival,” said marine mammal
biologist Craig Matkin, Executive Director of the North Gulf
Oceanic Society.
In October 2008, NMFS listed the whale as endangered over the
objections of then-governor Sarah Palin. The listing occurred
following petitions and litigation by the Center for Biological
Diversity (CBD) and local and national organizations. However,
rather than designate critical habitat for the beluga at the
time of listing as required by the Endangered Species Act, NMFS
deferred habitat protection for a year. That year came and went
with no action by NMFS, and on October 29, 2009, CBD formally
notified the agency that it would file a lawsuit to force the
overdue designation.
“If we
quickly act to designate and protect the critical habitat of the
Cook Inlet beluga, this highly imperiled whale has a real chance
of recovery,”
said Rebecca Noblin, attorney at the Center for Biological
Diversity’s Anchorage office. “A species as critically
imperiled as the Cook Inlet beluga whale should not have to
endure further delay before its habitat is truly protected.”
Today’s proposal triggers a public comment period and likely
public hearings before the rule is finalized and takes legal
effect.
“Cook Inlet beluga whales are one of the most endangered
populations of marine mammals in the world,” said Taryn Kiekow,
staff attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council’s
Marine Mammal Protection Project. “The decision to designate
critical habitat is long overdue and absolutely necessary to
preserving and protecting this unique population from further
harm.”
The Cook Inlet beluga whale is a genetically distinct and
geographically isolated population whose numbers have plummeted
in recent decades. Recent surveys show the Cook Inlet beluga
whale’s population now hovers between 300 and 400 animals, down
from an estimated population of approximately 1,300 whales in
the 1980s. The Cook Inlet beluga whale is one of five
populations of beluga, or white whales, in Alaska.
“Historic data shows that ESA listings and healthy economies
go hand in hand, said Toby Smith, Executive Director of the
Alaska Center for the Environment. “This habitat designation
will bring about the balance we need to promote truly
responsible development while protecting one of Alaska’s most
popular wildlife icons.”
The original decline of the Cook Inlet beluga was likely
caused by unregulated harvests, but the population has failed to
rebound since hunting was curtailed in 1999, indicating that
other factors likely are interfering with its recovery.
Cook Inlet is the most populated and fastest-growing
watershed in Alaska, and is subject to significant offshore oil
and gas development in beluga habitat. Additionally, other
sources will require heightened attention, including polluted
runoff and sewage, noise, the proposed Knik Arm Bridge, the Port
of Anchorage expansion, the proposed Chuitna coal strip mine and
the proposed export facility for the Pebble mine.
“Today’s proposal is an important step toward embracing
science and not politics to protect the Cook Inlet beluga, but
protections for the whale remain far from complete,” said Bob
Shavelson, Executive Director of Cook Inletkeeper. “Now NMFS
needs to prepare a recovery plan and start to seriously
scrutinize activities that destroy beluga habitat.”
In January 2009, former governor Sarah Palin announced the
state of Alaska would sue the federal government to overturn
endangered species protections for the beluga. While her
successor has shown a similar hostility to science-based habitat
protection, the state has yet to file a lawsuit.
“It makes little sense for the State to waste
public dollars trying to fight the science that supports the
beluga habitat designation,” Noblin said. “If the state wants to
act in the best interests of Alaskans, it will work to safeguard
Cook Inlet, which will not only protect the beluga whale, but
the whole ecosystem, including the fish and fisheries that
depend upon it.”
More information on the Cook Inlet beluga whale:
Center for Biological Diversity:
www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/Cook_Inlet_beluga_whale/index.html.
Cook Inletkeeper:
www.inletkeeper.org/watershedWatch/Beluga.htm
Defenders of Wildlife:
http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/wildlife/beluga_whale.php
Natural Resources Defense Council:
http://www.nrdc.org/wildlife/habitat/esa/alaska03.asp
National Marine Fisheries Service:
www.fakr.noaa.gov/newsreleases/2009/cibelugas1209.htm
###
PRESS
RELEASE - FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE: January 14,
2009
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Craig Matkin, NGOS:
907.299.0677
John Schoen, Audubon:
907.276.7034
Bob Shavelson, Inletkeeper:
907.299.3277
Brendon Cummings, CBD:
760.366.2232x304
Karla Dutton, Defenders:
907.276.9420
Palin Lawsuit
Against Beluga Whales Ignores Science
Experts
Agree Whale is Endangered
ANCHORAGE – The Palin Administration’s recent announcement to challenge the
listing of the Cook Inlet beluga whale under the federal
Endangered Species Act (ESA) drew a sharp rebuke from scientists
and citizens’ groups today. The National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) listed the beluga whale as “endangered” in
October 2008 after an exhaustive scientific review. The State
of Alaska announced its intent to challenge the listing in a
January 12, 2009, letter to NMFS.
“It seems the Palin
Administration only likes one kind of science – the kind it
agrees with,” said Craig Matkin, an Alaskan marine mammal expert
with the North Gulf Oceanic Society. “Every objective expert
who’s looked at this small and isolated population agrees it
should be listed.”
In 2006, the
renowned World Conservation Union (IUCN) put the Cook Inlet
beluga whale on its “Red List” for critically endangered
species.¹
IUCN relies on scientific experts well-versed in marine mammal
population dynamics to develop its recommendations; the only
IUCN category above “critically endangered is “extinct”.
The U.S. Marine
Mammal Commission – the expert agency charged by Congress with
protecting the nation’s marine mammal populations – has
repeatedly called for an endangered species listing for the Cook
Inlet beluga whale.²
“The science
supporting this listing is unequivocal and a listing decision
was supported by the prestigious U.S. Marine Mammal Commission.
An ESA listing of the Cook Inlet population of beluga whales is
clearly a case where science and the rule of law should
prevail,” said Dr. John Schoen, Senior Scientist at Audubon
Alaska.
“The ESA has a long,
demonstrated history showing that responsible development and
endangered species can co-exist,” said Bob Shavelson, Executive
Director of Cook Inletkeeper. “The Palin Administration should
respect the science and the rule of law, not throw public tax
dollars at a frivolous lawsuit.”
“Once again Governor
Palin has demonstrated either a complete lack of understanding
or lack of concern over the plight of endangered species,” said
Brendan Cummings, Oceans Program Director at the Center for
Biological Diversity.”
“The good news is that with the ESA
listing we are already in the process of finding out why the
whales are not thriving and what we should do to reverse the
decline. The Cook Inlet beluga whale population cannot recover
without our help, but the Governor is using precious state funds
and staff resources to block our collective efforts. We’re
disappointed but not surprised,” concluded Karla Dutton, Alaska
Director of Defenders of Wildlife.
Additional
information on the long history of NMFS’s scientific and policy
inquiry into the Cook Inlet beluga whale listing can be found
at:
http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/protectedresources/whales/beluga/management.htm#esa
1
See IUCN Red List:
www.iucnredlist.org/details/61442#nogo1
2
See U.S. Marine Mammal Commission:
www.mmc.gov/species/belugawhale.html
Press Release
(pdf)
Oct. 17, 2008 - Feds List Cook Inlet Beluga whale as
"Endangered"
On October 17, 2008, the National Marine
Fisheries Service designated the Cook Inlet Beluga whale as
"endangered" under the federal Endangered Species Act.
Inletkeeper has been working to protect the Cook Inlet
Beluga whale for more than a decade, and the listing came in
response to a petition filed by
Trustees for Alaska on
behalf of lead petitioner Cook Inletkeeper and other groups
and individuals (see below).
"This is a long awaited triumph of
science over politics," said Bob Shavelson, Cook
Inletkeeper. "Now, we need all stakeholders to come
together to fund the research needed to understand why the
Cook Inlet Beluga whale population has failed to recover."
Under the listing, NMFS will now be
required to identify the whale's critical habitat, and
activities affecting that habitat will require consultation
with NMFS. Despite rhetoric from whale protection
opponents, ESA listings do not hamper responsible
development (see Inletkeeper letter to Kenai Peninsula
Borough
here and Chamber of Commerce Talking Points
here)The Beluga whale has long been ignored in
management and permitting decisions on oil and gas, sewage,
port expansion and related projects (for example, see this
letter from NMFS decrying the removal of 135 acres of
Beluga habitat as part of the Port of Anchorage expansion).
For NMFS's list of development projects potentially
affecting the Beluga whale, go
here.
Cook Inletkeeper recognizes the Cook
Inlet Beluga whale as a vital strand in the ecological
fabric that makes up the Cook Inlet ecosystem, and this
ecosystem supports the economic and natural vitality of
Southcentral Alaska. As a result, Inletkeeper will
continue to play a leading role fighting to protect the
whale and its habitat from irresponsible development.
For more information, see:
.
Sept. 25, 2008 - NMFS
Surveys show Cook Inlet Beluga whale population has
flat-lined; Scientists, Groups Urge President Bush &
Governor Palin to respect scientific integrity and rule of
law
See press release
here
See NMFS survey results
here
June 30, 2008 - Lawsuit
Filed to Protect Endangered Whales
On May 1,
2008, the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission (MMC) wrote a strong
letter to the National Marine Fisheries Service, saying
there was no scientific basis for a delay in listing the
Cook Inlet beluga whale. The MMC is the expert agency
charged by Congress with protecting the nation's marine
mammal resources, and its unequivocal position strongly
suggests that politics - not science - has invaded NMFS
decision making process. In response, on May 20,
Inletkeeper wrote to NMFS Director Jim Balsiger, calling for
an immediate listing. The need to list is all the more
urgent as the mating and birthing season begins for the
beluga - and as large development projects, including the
Port of Anchorage expansion, the Port MacKenzie expansion,
the Mat Su Ferry, the Knik Arm Bridge, the Chuitna coal
strip mine and large scale oil and gas drilling - move
forward in the whale's critical habitat.
Inletkeeper May 20, 2008 Letter to NMFS (includes May 1 MMC
letter)
On April 21,
2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) bowed to
political pressure from industry and local governments, and
delayed a decision on listing the Cook Inlet beluga whale
for an additional six months.
Inletkeeper and other groups strongly
oppose the delay, arguing the science is clear: the Cook
Inlet population of beluga whales should be listed
immediately under the federal Endangered Species Act.
For more information, see links below:
Press release from groups opposing NMFS delay
Federal
Register Notice from NMFS
Write to
NOAA’s Jim Balsiger and tell him to listen to his own
scientists – and ignore the sky-is-falling rhetoric from
industry special interests – by listing the Cook Inlet
beluga whale under the ESA. See below for additional
information and talking points. You can email Jim by
clicking
here.
Thank YOU!
On August 3, 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service
officially closed the public comment period on whether to list
the Cook Inlet beluga whale under the federal Endangered Species
Act (ESA). Inletkeeper was lead petitioner in April 2005
when Trustees for Alaska
filed legal papers requesting NMFS to list the beluga under the
ESA. NMFS held public hearings in Homer, Anchorage,
Soldotna and Silver Spring, MD in July 2007, and the public
testimony strongly supported listing the beluga. Additionally,
Inletkeeper and its state and national allies helped generate
over 150,000 comments to NMFS in support of listing! Not
surprisingly, the State of Alaska, local municipalities and
extractive industries vigorously opposed extra protections for
the beluga whale. You can read comments submitted by
NRDC and the
Center for
Biological Diversity on behalf of Inletkeeper and others
here, and
you can read Governor Palin's press release and the State of
Alaska's comments
here.
NMFS now has 12 months to list the beluga under the ESA, and
Inletkeeper will continue to fight short-sighted projects that
threaten important beluga whale habitat.
THE PROBLEM: The Cook
Inlet beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) is a
genetically distinct and geographically isolated population
whose numbers have plummeted over 50% in the past decade.
The beluga’s plight is so dire the National Marine Fisheries
Service recently proposed an “endangered” listing for the whale
under the Endangered Species Act. While subsistence
hunting has been blamed as a primary cause for the whale’s
decline, tight controls on subsistence harvests have not
resulted in the population rebound agency scientists predicted.
Sewage discharges, oil and gas wastes, polluted run-off,
shipping traffic, noise, and habitat loss are but a few of the
possible issues affecting beluga recovery. In 2006, the experts
at the World Conservation Union (IUCN) put the Cook Inlet beluga
on the “red list” for critically endangered species. Current
surveys suggest only 250-350 whales remain in Cook Inlet (from
historical highs around 1300 animals). One major stranding
event or oil spill could spell the end for this Cook Inlet icon.
Large corporations and local politicians are fighting the
listing process, so it’s up to YOU to ensure our
kids can enjoy the Cook Inlet belugas for years to come.
For more information, see:
April 19, 2007 Conservation Group Press Release
Proposed Beluga
Whale Endangered Rule
NMFS Press Release
BACKGROUND: The Cook Inlet beluga whale (Delphinapterus
leucas) is a genetically distinct and geographically
isolated population whose numbers have plummeted over 50% in the
past decade. Today, federal agency scientists estimate fewer
than 280 belugas remain in Cook Inlet – down from historical
estimates of 1300. The whale’s plight is so dire the World
Conservation Union in April 2006 added the Cook Inlet beluga to
its “Red List, ” classifying it as “critically endangered.”
There is only one category after critically endangered:
“extinct.” The Cook Inlet beluga is already listed as
“threatened” under the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
Now, in light of continuing population declines, the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has opened pubic comment on a
“status review,” to determine whether the Cook Inlet beluga
should be listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Scientists at the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission – the federal
agency mandated by Congress to oversee NMFS and to protect the
nation’s marine mammal resources – have repeatedly called on
NMFS to list the beluga under the ESA. Such a listing will
require NMFS to designate and protect critical habitat for the
beluga, and offers the best hope this Cook Inlet icon will
endure for generations to come.
Threats to the Cook Inlet beluga whale:
Cook Inlet is the most populated and fastest growing watershed
in Alaska. The state’s largest city – Anchorage – lies adjacent
to some of the most important beluga habitat in the region.
Polluted run-off from rain and snowmelt, combined with large
sewage discharges, pour directly into prime beluga feeding,
mating and birthing habitats. Cook Inlet is also the birthplace
of commercial oil and gas development in Alaska, and underwater
seismic blasting, toxic dumping from offshore platforms, and
regular leaks and spills threaten the whales and their habitat.
The U.S. Army also retains a presence in Cook Inlet, and its
bombing range at Eagle River Flats on Fort Richardson regularly
showers toxic and other pollutants into areas that support
belugas and their prey. Cook Inlet is also a major shipping hub
and fishing center, and ship traffic, noise, port dredging and
prey disturbance may also be affecting belugas.
In addition to existing development, a
series of proposals raises serious concerns about the future for
beluga whales in Cook Inlet. For example, the Port of Anchorage
plans to fill over 135 acres of beluga habitat as part of a
major expansion project, and proposed dredging associated with
the expansion will impacts hundreds of additional acres.
Another proposed addition to the Port is the Department of
Homeland Security’s “Integrated Anti-Swimmer Device” – a complex
sonar array designed to thwart waterborne attacks on the Port.
Sonar is well-known to cause problems with whale “echolocation,”
but information on IAS impacts to belugas has not yet been
determined. Furthermore, the Chuitna Coal Project, lying
southwest of Anchorage, is slated to begin permitting this
summer, and if developed, would add another major industrial
port in an area important to belugas. Finally, plans continue
to progress for the Knik Arm Crossing, a new bridge and fill
project that would bisect some of the most important beluga
habitat in the entire Inlet, just outside of Anchorage.
Aside from aerial surveys and limited
tissue sampling, there has been no concerted effort to
understand even the most basic behaviors of the Cook Inlet
beluga, let alone any serious attempts to understand the
individual and cumulative effects from industrial activities.
Cook Inlet boasts the highest tidal range in the United States,
and one or more mass strandings on the region’s shifting shoals
could be enough to push the beluga over the brink to extinction.
Background on the Cook Inlet beluga
whale: Alaska Native traditional knowledge tells of beluga
subsistence hunts for the past several hundred years in Cook
Inlet, and early homesteaders are known to have hunted for food,
sport and whale bones. In the early-to-mid 1990’s, unregulated
subsistence hunting (permitted for Native Alaskans under federal
and international law) led to high mortality within the Cook
Inlet beluga stock. In 1999, Congress passed legislation making
it illegal for anyone to “take” a Cook Inlet beluga whale unless
such harvest occurred under a cooperative management agreement
between Native Alaska hunters and the National Marine Fisheries
Service. Subsequent co-management agreements sharply curtailed
subsistence hunting, and NMFS biologists predicted the Cook
Inlet beluga population would rebound to sustainable levels. In
2000, NMFS refused to list the whale under the Endangered
Species Act, and instead chose the less rigorous protections
afforded by a “depleted” listing under the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). Five years after the MMPA listing – in
March 2005 - NMFS finally published the draft Conservation Plan
required by the MMPA, and as of May 2006, the final plan had yet
to be released. In April 2006, with the latest surveys
estimating only 278 whales remaining, NMFS opened public comment
on a status review, to determine whether the Cook Inlet beluga
whale should be listed under the Endangered Species Act.
INLETKEEPER’S
SOLUTIONS
Inletkeeper is pressing state and federal resource managers to
designate critical habitat for the beluga whale under the
Endangered Species Act, so areas where whales feed, mate and
birth can be protected. In the meantime, Inletkeeper is
educating the public and the media about the plight of this Cook
Inlet icon, and challenging short sighted proposals that pollute
or destroy important beluga habitat. Contact Inletkeeper for
more information.
TAKE
ACTION
·
Write to your elected official
·
Write a letter to the editor
·
Sign-up for action alerts on breaking news
·
Forward this page to a friend
·
Check back here for updates
·
Join
Inletkeeper!
ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES & LINKS (links open in new window)
National Marine Fisheries Service:
Cook Inlet Beluga Whale Overview
National Marine Mammal Laboratory Satellite Tracking Data
Alaska Fisheries Science Center
AFSC Beluga Whale Fact Sheet
U.S. Marine Mammal Commission
Alaska
Department of Fish & Game
Cetacea.org
World Conservation Union
“Red List” of Endangered Species
|