Bear Viewing is Big Business in Cook Inlet. But Don’t Ask the Pebble People.

by | May 14, 2019 | Bears, Clean Water, Healthy Habitat, Local Economies, Pebble Mine, Salmon

New study shows bear viewing industry supports nearly 500 jobs and more than $34 million in sales annually See Report Summary here & Full Report here. We’re getting tired talking […]

New study shows bear viewing industry supports nearly 500 jobs and more than $34 million in sales annually

See Report Summary here & Full Report here.

We’re getting tired talking about what a stupid idea it is to put a giant, toxic hole in the headwaters of the world’s greatest sockeye fishery.  We’ve grown uncomfortably numb to Pebble’s lobbying and insider politics to get its ill-conceived project the permits it needs. And we’re sick and tired hearing the billionaire Koch Brothers press for a project most Alaskans don’t want.

But we’ll never stop fighting to protect the things that make Alaska great, and in Cook Inlet, that means brown bears, and the many families, jobs and businesses that bear-viewing supports.

Lower Cook Inlet boasts the highest concentration of brown bears on the planet. From Katmai and Lake Clark National Parks, to the McNeil River State Wildlife Sanctuary – and everywhere in between – Cook Inlet is truly a global phenomena when it comes to brown bears.

Today, Inletkeeper joined its partners to release a new study, The Economic Contribution of Bear Viewing in Southcentral Alaska.”  Authored by researchers at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks, the report finds:

  • Bear viewing related service providers (air/boat taxis, guides, lodging) reported $34.5 million in sales in 2017; 
  • Bear viewing service providers paid approximately $10 million in direct wages and benefits and hired 371 employees in 2017. 
  • Direct spending by service providers and households contributes approximately $19 million in value added to the regional economy.
  • Direct purchases by bear viewing service providers and their households support approximately $36.3 million in economic production in the region.
  • Bear viewing spending by service providers and households supports approximately $17.3 million in labor income in the region, including $10 million in direct wages and benefits;
  • Spending by bear viewing service providers and households supports 490 sustainable jobs in the region, including 371 reported direct hires.

Pebble’s current plan is to build a massive road and pipeline complex from Lake Iliamna to Amakdedori Creek, in Kamishak Bay in southwest Cook Inlet.  There, they say they will build a giant export facility to load barges which will transfer ore concentrate to huge bulk carriers destined for the cheapest place to smelt the ore.

We did a reconnaissance trip to Amakdedori Creek last year to check it out, and without going into too much detail, the Pebble people are crazy if they think they can move cargo in the radical weather and navigational conditions of Kamishak Bay.

Yet while Alaskans understand how challenging this area is for mariners – and how unique it is for brown bears – the draft Environmental Impact Statement issued by the Army Corps of Engineers utterly fails to address impacts to bears or bear viewing in any meaningful way. That’s no surprise, because Pebble’s trying to rush through the EIS process while the Trump/Dunleavy Administrations are in power. But it’s outrageous nonetheless.

As Dave Bachrach, a longtime bear viewing guide and owner of the bear viewing business AK Adventures, Inc., based in Homer, said:

“Bear viewing businesses play a vital economic role from Homer to Anchorage and beyond.  I was pretty surprised and disappointed when the Army Corps completely ignored the economic impacts from bear viewing businesses in the Pebble DEIS.”

Bear viewing – like sport, commercial and subsistence fishing – can provide sustainable jobs, foods and revenues for our local communities for a long time if they’re properly managed. Giant open pit mines and huge toxic waste pits cannot.

So, chalk up yet another reason the proposed Pebble Mine makes no sense for Alaska. Because at the most basic level, it’s just “unbearable.”

Similar Posts

Understanding The Johnson Tract Mine through ANCSA

To understand the Johnson Tract Mine, we must understand that the foundational purpose of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) was to open land to extraction. ANCSA reshaped the public narrative around what it means to be Alaska Native, creating real trade-offs that Alaska Native people continue to navigate today and fundamentally shaped how Alaska’s lands are managed.

The “Big, Beautiful Cook Inlet” (BBC1): March Lease Sales Move Forward without New Environmental Reviews

Instead of conducting updated environmental analysis, on the BBC1 lease sale the administration indicated it would rely on reviews completed in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Inletkeeper has joined with community and environmental groups to formally notify Interior Secretary Doug Burgum of their intent to sue if the sale proceeds without required consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Relying on outdated reports disregards nearly a decade worth of analysis on the accelerating impacts of climate change, increased industrial activity, and updated science on species and habitat conditions.

We can’t risk turning climate pollution into water pollution

Carbon capture has a host of uncertainties upstream of the injection well. But let’s set aside for now the unsolved technological question of how CO2 can be affordably captured at any significant scale. Likewise the economic and political questions of how to price and/or police carbon to make polluters capture it. What concerns do we have about pumping CO2 underground, and the vigilance needed to be sure it doesn’t harm the people and ecosystems above?