Donate

Dunleavy Opens Spill Rules for Industry Rollbacks

by | Oct 16, 2019 | Clean Water, Climate Change, Energy & Alaska, Healthy Habitat, Local Economies, Salmon

In the 1960’s and 1970’s, Americans joined together to secure some of the best air, land and water protections in the world.  Then the pendulum started to swing back, with […]

In the 1960’s and 1970’s, Americans joined together to secure some of the best air, land and water protections in the world.  Then the pendulum started to swing back, with billions of dollars from corporations, think tanks and phony “astroturf” groups pushing an aggressive anti-consumer, anti-environment agenda. 

Today, from Koch Industries to Exxon, and from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to Monsanto, the drive for corporate profits has eroded the basic safety net protecting our kids, our families and our communities.

Now we’re faced with yet another rollback agenda in Alaska, with the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation proposing a new process to unravel plans put in place after the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill (EVOS) to better prevent and respond to oil spills.

Like similar rollback efforts across the nation, the corporations use specific language to denote this “deregulatory agenda.”  This time around, we’re hearing from Governor Dunleavy that “Alaska’s open for business” – as if somehow, before he was Governor, the state was actually “closed for business.”

Like any solid propaganda effort to undo protections that Alaskans support, this agenda needs a good storyline. So, ADEC’s saying that it’s “heard from many Alaskans” about their concerns with current spill prevention and response rules.

But there’s one problem: ADEC cannot or will not tell us which Alaskans have expressed concerns.

The process to re-open the rules and law around spill prevention and response – which already have been revised nine times since the EVOS to make them more “efficient” for industry – is expensive and time consuming – for our state government and for everyday Alaskans alike.

ADEC has better things to do than cater to the whims of oil companies hoping to expand drilling and shipping into the Arctic.  For example, the state is grappling with a public health crisis around contaminated drinking water, and ADEC’s considering whether to allow Hilcorp to increase its toxic oil dumping in Cook Inlet fisheries. 

So, tell ADEC our spill prevention and response rules are working just fine, and ADEC should not waste our public dollars on a process that will most surely rollback safeguards for Alaska’s prized fisheries and our coastal communities.

Submit comments here: http://alaskadec.commentinput.com/?id=fdLgJY2gM

Similar Posts

Before AK LNG Asks for Tax Breaks, They Need to Stop Hiding Its Costs

by | Feb 18, 2026 | , ,

Governor Mike Dunleavy has said he plans to introduce legislation to give the AKLNG project a 90% break on the property taxes that help fund local schools, roads, and emergency services. Consultants, too, give legislators a hard sell on the need for tax breaks and other “risk sharing” between the project and the state. We need to know: if the legendary gasline were built, what would we in south central Alaska be paying for North Slope gas?

The “Big, Beautiful Cook Inlet” (BBC1): March Lease Sales Move Forward without New Environmental Reviews

by | Feb 18, 2026 | , , ,

Instead of conducting updated environmental analysis, on the BBC1 lease sale the administration indicated it would rely on reviews completed in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Inletkeeper has joined with community and environmental groups to formally notify Interior Secretary Doug Burgum of their intent to sue if the sale proceeds without required consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Relying on outdated reports disregards nearly a decade worth of analysis on the accelerating impacts of climate change, increased industrial activity, and updated science on species and habitat conditions.