The Future of Lower Cook Inlet

by | Oct 6, 2021 | Energy & Alaska, Lease Sale 258, Oil & Gas

This past weekend there was quite the stir in Homer as a jack-up rig came down Cook Inlet, into Kachemak Bay, and around the spit. Meanwhile, California communities were hit […]

This past weekend there was quite the stir in Homer as a jack-up rig came down Cook Inlet, into Kachemak Bay, and around the spit. Meanwhile, California communities were hit with the news of a massive oil spill from a pipeline leak off the southern coast.

These events made me reflect on the history of oil and gas in Cook Inlet and why our petition to stop Lease Sale 258 to protect Cook Inlet for the future is so important. 

First, the drilling rig (a “jack-up rig”) in Kachemak Bay provided us a brief glimpse into the history of Cook Inlet and what could have been if the Alaska Legislature had not bought back Kachemak Bay oil and gas leases in 1976. Usually, it is hard for me to look out at the Bay and imagine what it would have looked like without the buyback program. This weekend as I watched the rig move by the spit, it was easy to imagine oil and gas platforms and infrastructure littered around the Bay. 

But the buyback almost didn’t happen – it was three votes short of passing until a relatively small oil spill in Kachemak Bay happened from a jack-up rig named the George Ferris. The rest is history: the legislature voted for the buyback and to create the Kachemak Bay Critical Habitat Area. 

Now, 45 years later, it’s hard to imagine Kachemak Bay any other way. In a different reality, we might have had oil but we would not have Homer’s thriving tourism industry, which runs off of  Kachemak Bay’s fisheries, birds, and wildlife. 

Ultimately, this jack-up rig will only be here for a few days before it is moved to another location but it is a stark reminder of what Alaskans prevented in Kachemak Bay in the 70s. 

Second, the spill of 136,000 gallons of oil off of California’s coast from a leaking pipeline had me considering the future of Cook Inlet. History has repeatedly shown that accidents, spills, and leaks will occur from pipelines, tankers, and drilling platforms. Upper Cook Inlet already has over 300 miles of aging pipelines – pipelines with a long history of leaks. And if Lease Sale 258 in Lower Cook Inlet occurs, miles of new pipeline would be installed along with the drilling rigs, platforms, and other infrastructure. Cook Inlet has incredibly strong tides, sea ice, earthquakes, and large waves that will test any installed infrastructure for generations to come. 

I know the future I want for our Inlet, our economy, our tourism, our fisheries, and our community. It is a future where we have protected Lower Cook Inlet from industrialization and pollution. It is a future where we stop relying on dirty fossil fuels and look to renewable energy. It is a future where Alaska Natives can continue to subsist off the land as they have for time immemorial. It is a future where our fisheries are thriving. We, like Alaskans in the 70s, must stand up for this future. 

Join me, along with over 1,500 other Alaskans, in asking the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to cancel Lease Sale 258 and protect Lower Cook Inlet from future lease sales. Please join me and sign the petition here!

Thank you for reading. We are able to do this work because of member support from concerned citizens like you. Please donate today to protect Cook Inlet for our future generations.

Similar Posts

Before AK LNG Asks for Tax Breaks, They Need to Stop Hiding Its Costs

Governor Mike Dunleavy has said he plans to introduce legislation to give the AKLNG project a 90% break on the property taxes that help fund local schools, roads, and emergency services. Consultants, too, give legislators a hard sell on the need for tax breaks and other “risk sharing” between the project and the state. We need to know: if the legendary gasline were built, what would we in south central Alaska be paying for North Slope gas?

The “Big, Beautiful Cook Inlet” (BBC1): March Lease Sales Move Forward without New Environmental Reviews

Instead of conducting updated environmental analysis, on the BBC1 lease sale the administration indicated it would rely on reviews completed in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Inletkeeper has joined with community and environmental groups to formally notify Interior Secretary Doug Burgum of their intent to sue if the sale proceeds without required consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Relying on outdated reports disregards nearly a decade worth of analysis on the accelerating impacts of climate change, increased industrial activity, and updated science on species and habitat conditions.