Donate

Addressing the Hilcorp-Shaped Elephant in the Room: Why Alaskans Should Support SB 92

by | Apr 1, 2025 | Government, Alaska State Legislature, Energy & Alaska

SB 92 aims to close a glaring loophole in Alaska’s tax code—one that allows pass-through entities, known as S corporations, to avoid paying state corporate income taxes. While most large corporations contribute to state revenues through corporate income taxes, oil and gas S corporations, such as Hilcorp, do not pay a dime in state income tax under current law.

As the state of Alaska stares down a projected $536 million deficit over the next two fiscal years, legislators are scrambling for solutions to avoid yet another budget crisis. Among the clearest and most straightforward answers on the table is Senate Bill 92 (SB 92), introduced earlier this year by Sen. Rob Yundt (R-Wasilla).

SB 92 aims to close a glaring loophole in Alaska’s tax code—one that allows pass-through entities, known as S corporations, to avoid paying state corporate income taxes. While most large corporations contribute to state revenues through corporate income taxes, oil and gas S corporations, such as Hilcorp, do not pay a dime in state income tax under current law.

This legislation, if passed, would impose a tax on S corporation income over $5 million, generating an estimated $100 million per year in much-needed revenue for the state. That money could be invested in critical public services and infrastructure, including electrical and energy upgrades that are vital for Alaska’s long-term energy security.

Closing the S corporation loophole is not a radical proposal—it is simply a matter of fairness. When Sen. Yundt first introduced SB 92 on February 19, he was direct in his reasoning: “I believe everybody should be treated the same. That is all this is for me.” However, he later withdrew his support for the bill—speculatively under pressure from the oil and gas industry, which has aggressively lobbied against it.

Despite industry claims that taxing S corporations would harm business, there is no evidence to suggest that this tax break has stimulated job creation or investment in Alaska. In fact, S corporations already pay income taxes in every other state except Alaska, making our state an extreme outlier. A 2021 Fiscal Working Group recommended closing this loophole as a common-sense measure to stabilize Alaska’s budget.

Continuing to allow this loophole is not indicative of public will, and legislators have a responsibility to pursue this option. SB 92 enjoys widespread bipartisan support, demonstrating that Alaskans recognize the necessity of closing this loophole and ensuring fair taxation.

A recent survey from Data for Progress asked Alaska voters if they support or oppose changing the state’s tax structure so that Hilcorp, a major oil and gas producer, would pay state corporate income tax. The results were decisive:

  • 77% of Alaskans support requiring Hilcorp to pay corporate income tax, while only 17% oppose it.
  • Two-thirds of Republicans (66%) support this proposal.
  • This proposal enjoys broad popular support in every region of Alaska. Even in the Kenai Peninsula, where Southcentral Alaska’s natural gas shortage looms and Hilcorp is the primary producer, voters support the tax by a +50-point margin. Support is even stronger in every other part of the state.

The Path Forward

Alaskans can no longer afford to subsidize oil and gas companies at the expense of our schools, infrastructure, and essential services. If legislators are serious about addressing the state’s ongoing fiscal crisis, they must prioritize policies that bring in fair and sustainable revenue—not continue to bow to industry influence.

SB 92 is a practical and necessary step toward ensuring that Alaska’s wealth is reinvested in its people and its future. Now is the time to speak up. On April 2nd in an exciting showing of bipartisanship this bill advanced to the Senate Finance Committee with a 5-2 vote! Call your legislators and urge them to support SB 92. 

Senate Finance Committee

Similar Posts

What’s Next for Planned Offshore Lease Sales in Lower Cook Inlet

by | Feb 5, 2026 | , , ,

Last year, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) prematurely scrapped an offshore management plan that protected Alaskan coastal waters from oil and gas leasing. Now, the agency is planning multiple leases for Lower Cook Inlet in their new 5-year plan. It’s vital that we continue to speak up for our coastal ecosystems, sustainable fisheries, and what’s best for our local economies. Learn what happens next.

Offshore drilling is political theatre, not an energy solution

by | Jan 22, 2026 | , ,

As the Cook Inlet gas we’ve historically relied on for heat and electricity becomes more expensive and precarious, the Trump administration is offering a golden chance to prolong our dependence, spend more on energy, and create a long-term drag on our economy by doubling down on what isn’t working. What’s the price of this opportunity? Only a 1-in-5 risk of major oil spills, which increases with each new piece of extraction infrastructure. The art of the deal!

Not interested? Well, it’s your lucky day. BOEM is signing you up anyway.

SB-92: How to Keep Alaska’s Budget From Driving Over a Cliff

by | Dec 12, 2025 | , ,

Taxing oil and gas S-Corporations in the same manner as C-corporations is an important first step in repairing Alaska’s fiscal foundations. As long as oil and gas extraction is a significant source of state revenue, Alaska will be undermining itself by preserving a loophole that allows Hilcorp, now the state’s major industry player, to profit from our resources without paying income tax that would be collected in any other state.