Bristol Bay Remains Protected: The Pebble Mine EPA Veto

Clean Water, Cook Inlet, Pebble Mine, Salmon

Even as the administration pushes for more resource extraction in Alaska, defending the EPA’s veto shows they know what Alaskans, Tribes, commercial fishermen, and local communities have said all along: Bristol Bay is simply too valuable to gamble away.
At the end of June, the Trump administration stood by the EPA’s veto of the Pebble Mine during oral arguments in federal court. This is an encouraging sign in the ongoing fight to defend Bristol Bay from one of the most reckless mining proposals Alaska has ever faced.
 
The Pebble Partnership is seeking to overturn the EPA’s 2023 Clean Water Act determination, which found that the massive open-pit mine would pose unacceptable risks to the Bristol Bay watershed. As an intervenor in the case, Inletkeeper is working alongside partners to defend the EPA’s veto and the protections it provides for Bristol Bay. During the hearing, attorneys for the federal government argued that the agency’s decision remains supported by the scientific record and the significant threats the project would pose to fish habitat, wetlands, and the world-renowned Bristol Bay salmon fishery.
 
Even as the administration pushes for more resource extraction in Alaska, defending the EPA’s veto shows they know what Alaskans, Tribes, commercial fishermen, and local communities have said all along: Bristol Bay is simply too valuable to gamble away.
 
The lawsuit remains ongoing, and Pebble’s backers continue searching for avenues to advance the project. For now, the EPA’s veto still stands and is being defended in court. We’ll keep watching every move and keep pushing for permanent protections so Bristol Bay’s salmon, communities, and way of life are safe for future generations.

Similar Posts

Net Metering Continues: HEA July Meeting Update

This calls into question HEA’s commitment, or lack thereof, to member transparency. We understand not wanting to add fuel to an unpopular opinion from one board member, but members have a right to know what is discussed at board meetings and the intentions of the board members, popular or unpopular. Instead of telling members their comments are misinformed, HEA should better inform members by publishing recordings of each board meeting and capturing more detailed minutes.