Feige Shows State Bias in Pebble Letter to Corps

by | Apr 29, 2020 | Bears, Clean Water, Government, Healthy Habitat, Pebble Mine

When it comes to development projects like the Pebble mine, our state agencies in Alaska are supposed to be neutral arbiters.  They can call balls and strikes, and but they’re […]

When it comes to development projects like the Pebble mine, our state agencies in Alaska are supposed to be neutral arbiters.  They can call balls and strikes, and but they’re not supposed to hit home runs for one side or another.

But a recent letter from the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources makes it painfully clear the State of Alaska is tilting the playing field for a Canadian mining company while ignoring every Alaskan concerned about the coronavirus and the health of Bristol Bay.

On April 15, DNR Commissioner Corri Feige wrote a letter to the Army Corps urging it to stick to its permitting schedule for the Pebble mine, despite the chaos and confusion caused by the coronavirus.  

Fiege’s letter is remarkably tone-deaf on one hand, and reflects horrible public policy on the other.

First, in urging the Corps to plow ahead despite the myriad disruptions caused by the coronavirus, Feige completely ignores the Native and commercial fishing voices from Bristol Bay who have called-on the Corps to suspend Pebble permitting.  As a result, Feige’s letter is another giant slap in the face to Alaskans who believe DNR should be looking out for the health and safety of Alaskans, rather than lobbying for a Canadian mining company.  

Second, Feige’s letter makes no effort to hide the fact the Dunleavy Administration presumes Pebble will get its permits (e.g., “The proposed Pebble Mine Project is important to Alaskans, as it will provide jobs, infrastructure, and revenues critical for local, regional, and statewide economies… (emphasis added)”).  In fact, the whole letter makes Pebble sound like a foregone conclusion.

Yet, by so blatantly showing its bias towards Pebble, Feige helps expose the myth around virtually every permitting decision in Alaska.  The state is not a neutral arbiter, but rather, it’s an active booster.  A lobbyist. A prejudiced party.

And to make matters worse, Feige’s running interference for Pebble using our Alaskan tax dollars.  The least she could do is to pass through the revolving door from state employment to corporate mining executive, and represent these Canadians with a Pebble hat on.

Similar Posts

Understanding The Johnson Tract Mine through ANCSA

To understand the Johnson Tract Mine, we must understand that the foundational purpose of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) was to open land to extraction. ANCSA reshaped the public narrative around what it means to be Alaska Native, creating real trade-offs that Alaska Native people continue to navigate today and fundamentally shaped how Alaska’s lands are managed.

The “Big, Beautiful Cook Inlet” (BBC1): March Lease Sales Move Forward without New Environmental Reviews

Instead of conducting updated environmental analysis, on the BBC1 lease sale the administration indicated it would rely on reviews completed in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Inletkeeper has joined with community and environmental groups to formally notify Interior Secretary Doug Burgum of their intent to sue if the sale proceeds without required consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Relying on outdated reports disregards nearly a decade worth of analysis on the accelerating impacts of climate change, increased industrial activity, and updated science on species and habitat conditions.