Hilcorp Gas Leak in Cook Inlet

by | Mar 22, 2017 | Clean Water

On February 8, Alaskans learned Texas-based Hilcorp Alaska had “discovered” a large leak from a natural gas fuel line supplying power to platforms on Middle Ground Shoal in Cook Inlet. […]

On February 8, Alaskans learned Texas-based Hilcorp Alaska had “discovered” a large leak from a natural gas fuel line supplying power to platforms on Middle Ground Shoal in Cook Inlet. Several weeks later, we learned Hilcorp knew – or should have known – about the leak months earlier, in December 2016 or earlier.

While ongoing pollution and lax environment enforcement remain unsettling concerns as the weeks pass by, perhaps the most glaring issue is Hilcorp’s inability to control a leaking pipeline in Alaska’s renowned winter conditions. If Hilcorp cannot or will not stop polluting our public resources, then it should have no right to operate in our waters in the first place.

Hilcorp has put forth various excuses why it cannot shut down the leaking pipeline in Cook Inlet’s icy conditions– including that water would infiltrate the gas line and other reasons – but the fact remains Hilcorp simply wants to maintain production and profits without interruption.

“Hilcorp’s obligation right now must be to Cook Inlet, not to continued profits,” said Inletkeeper Bob Shavelson. “Hilcorp has reaped sizable tax credits and enjoyed considerable profits during a time of fiscal crisis in Alaska, and it has a responsibility to do the right thing and shut-down the pipeline until it can operate safely without polluting Cook Inlet.”

Similar Posts

The “Big, Beautiful Cook Inlet” (BBC1): March Lease Sales Move Forward without New Environmental Reviews

Instead of conducting updated environmental analysis, on the BBC1 lease sale the administration indicated it would rely on reviews completed in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Inletkeeper has joined with community and environmental groups to formally notify Interior Secretary Doug Burgum of their intent to sue if the sale proceeds without required consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Relying on outdated reports disregards nearly a decade worth of analysis on the accelerating impacts of climate change, increased industrial activity, and updated science on species and habitat conditions.

We can’t risk turning climate pollution into water pollution

Carbon capture has a host of uncertainties upstream of the injection well. But let’s set aside for now the unsolved technological question of how CO2 can be affordably captured at any significant scale. Likewise the economic and political questions of how to price and/or police carbon to make polluters capture it. What concerns do we have about pumping CO2 underground, and the vigilance needed to be sure it doesn’t harm the people and ecosystems above?