Inletkeeper Applauds Halt to Cook Inlet Oil & Gas Lease Sale 258 Process

by | Feb 4, 2021 | Energy & Alaska, Lease Sale 258, Oil & Gas

Cook Inletkeeper today applauded the decision by the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) to cancel public hearings around the proposed million-acre Oil & Gas Lease Sale 258 in […]

Cook Inletkeeper today applauded the decision by the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) to cancel public hearings around the proposed million-acre Oil & Gas Lease Sale 258 in Lower Cook Inlet.  BOEM’s move comes in the wake of President Biden’s January 27 Executive Order placing a pause on all oil and gas leasing on federal lands and waters.

“It’s refreshing to see science coming back into our federal decision making,” said Bob Shavelson, Inletkeeper Advocacy Director.  “Local people and businesses have opposed the industrialization of Lower Cook Inlet for decades, and BOEM has taken an important first step to heed those concerns.”

While BOEM’s move today cancels public hearings around Lease Sale 258, it does not cancel the sale itself, which is now on pause until the Biden Administration conducts a review of oil and gas leasing on federal lands and waters.

BOEM has a legal mandate to promote renewable energy in federal waters, but it has historically favored oil and gas development and has yet to pursue the incredible tidal and wind resources in Lower Cook Inlet.

“BOEM has an opportunity to create good, lasting jobs and clean energy alternatives in Lower Cook Inlet that won’t upend our strong fishing and tourism economies,” Shavelson said.

In a remarkable disconnect between science and policy, BOEM announced Lease Sale 258 just as federal managers closed the Pacific cod fishery in Lower Cook Inlet last year – citing, for the first time ever, climate change as the culprit behind low population numbers.

“Alaska is already reeling from the effects of climate change, and we have to break the Big Oil stranglehold if we want to keep the things that make Alaska unique,” Shavelson said.

Similar Posts

Offshore drilling is political theatre, not an energy solution

As the Cook Inlet gas we’ve historically relied on for heat and electricity becomes more expensive and precarious, the Trump administration is offering a golden chance to prolong our dependence, spend more on energy, and create a long-term drag on our economy by doubling down on what isn’t working. What’s the price of this opportunity? Only a 1-in-5 risk of major oil spills, which increases with each new piece of extraction infrastructure. The art of the deal!

Not interested? Well, it’s your lucky day. BOEM is signing you up anyway.

We can’t risk turning climate pollution into water pollution

Carbon capture has a host of uncertainties upstream of the injection well. But let’s set aside for now the unsolved technological question of how CO2 can be affordably captured at any significant scale. Likewise the economic and political questions of how to price and/or police carbon to make polluters capture it. What concerns do we have about pumping CO2 underground, and the vigilance needed to be sure it doesn’t harm the people and ecosystems above?