On the day before Thanksgiving, Alaskans woke to astounding news: the Army Corps rejected a major permit for the Pebble mine. Never before had the Army Corps rejected a major […]

On the day before Thanksgiving, Alaskans woke to astounding news: the Army Corps rejected a major permit for the Pebble mine.

Never before had the Army Corps rejected a major permit for a large oil, gas or mining project in Alaska. Never.

And it only came about after years and years of relentless pressure from Alaskans who refused to give away the world’s richest salmon fishery to a junior Canadian mining corporation.  

So, the question then becomes: is the Pebble mine dead?

The short answer is yes. In shooting-down Pebble’s mitigation plan on November 25, the Army Corps essentially issued a death sentence to the Pebble mine.

While Pebble can certainly appeal the Army Corps’ decision, it faces a steep uphill climb. For example, Pebble would have to overcome key Corps findings, including the fact it failed to provide basic information to support its mitigation plan.  According to the Army Corps:

“The plan has been found noncompliant with nine specific requirements of rule to include:

(1) lack of detail to determine compensatory mitigation sufficiency,

(2) lack of information for preservation waiver,

(3) insufficient amount of compensatory mitigation,

(4) inadequate site protection,

(5) omission of a maintenance plan,

(6) omission of performance standards,

(7) omission of long term management plan,

(8) inadequate monitoring, and

(9) omission of financial assurances.”

These omissions and information gaps are not trivial. In fact, they support what Inletkeeper and its partners have been saying all along: the Pebble Partnership is ill-equipped to build and operate a massive open pit mine in the headwaters of Bristol Bay in a safe and reliable fashion.

The next question then becomes, does the Army Corps decision on Pebble prevent large scale mining in the Bristol Bay watershed in the future? And the answer to that question is an unequivocal “no.”

Why? Because the mining claims lying within the subsurface of the Bristol Bay watershed remain valid, and any company which holds these claims could make a push to develop them at any time.

So, while it’s important to celebrate the Army Corps’ historic decision to reject the Pebble mine, it’s even more important to double down on this monumental victory and work to secure permanent protections for Bristol Bay salmon and the countless families and communities they support.

And that means extinguishing all mining claims in the region, and installing permanent safeguards that protect wild Alaska salmon habitat for generations to come.

Similar Posts

Cook Inlet at a Crossroads

Cook Inlet | Tikahtnu is a special place. Its waters, salmon, wildlife, and communities have sustained life here for millennia. That didn’t happen by accident—and it won’t continue without people willing to stand up, speak out, and stay engaged. Thanks to supporters like you, Cook Inletkeeper has done exactly that for more than 30 years.

SB-92: How to Keep Alaska’s Budget From Driving Over a Cliff

Taxing oil and gas S-Corporations in the same manner as C-corporations is an important first step in repairing Alaska’s fiscal foundations. As long as oil and gas extraction is a significant source of state revenue, Alaska will be undermining itself by preserving a loophole that allows Hilcorp, now the state’s major industry player, to profit from our resources without paying income tax that would be collected in any other state.

“Government Efficiency”

Gov. Mike Dunleavy published Administrative Order 360 in early August to reduce “administrative and economic burdens associated with regulatory compliance.” But the order is more likely to slow down rather than speed up decisions we need for sustainable energy, as well as weakening protections for the ecosystems Alaskans depend on.

Unexpected Life in Unmapped Waters

I’ve waded in what I consider the most beautiful waters in the world here in the Cook Inlet watershed. I’ve chased every species of salmon that call these special waters home. However, after teaming up with the Kenai Watershed Forum (KWF) for Salmon Habitat Mapping field days—a program designed to engage volunteers in documenting local, unmapped salmon habitats as part of Inletkeeper’s Local Solutions series—I can now say that fish also live in unexpected places.