No Secrets, No Spills

by | Jun 16, 2023 | Clean Water, Climate Change, Energy & Alaska, Government, Healthy Habitat

In a recent decision hitting Hilcorp with a $265,500 fine for violating an approved drilling plan, the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) cited the company’s “track record of regulatory noncompliance.” […]

In a recent decision hitting Hilcorp with a $265,500 fine for violating an approved drilling plan, the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) cited the company’s “track record of regulatory noncompliance.” It sounds a lot like the AOGCC fine Hilcorp received in 2020, which also cited “a history of regulatory noncompliance,” as well as Hilcorp’s “lack of good faith” and the “need to deter similar behavior.” Or a 2015 letter in which AOGCC wrote that disregard for regulations was “endemic to Hilcorp’s approach to its Alaska operations,” and that “Hilcorp’s conduct is inexcusable.”   

It’s clear by this point that Hilcorp isn’t merely a business that cuts corners. Corner-cutting is its business model. While some Alaskan regulators write stern letters, others turn a blind eye. In December 2020, the Regulatory Commission of Alaska voted 4-1 to let Hilcorp purchase BP’s Alaskan assets, including its share of the state’s largest and most complex piece of oil and gas infrastructure, the 46-year-old Trans-Alaska pipeline.   

According to an analysis by the Alaska Petroleum Joint Crafts labor groupHilcorp spent 20% less on maintenance than other Alaskan oil and gas operators in 2018. “In our experience, deferred maintenance (or inadequate levels of maintenance spending) can put both frontline workers and the general public at risk,” the group wrote. In spite of Hilcorp’s known practice of squeezing profits from aging infrastructure by neglecting upkeep, the RCA decided to take Hilcorp on its word that the privately owned company has the resources to operate the pipeline safely and to respond to disaster. They approved the purchase while excusing Hilcorp from disclosing financial records that could have demonstrated its fitness — or lack thereof — to responsibly manage the pipeline. 

Now the city of Valdez, which would be on the frontline of any potential TAPS disaster, is taking the RCA to court over this poor decision. On June 27 the Alaska Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case that could force the RCA to reconsider its approval. 

If you’re going to be in Anchorage around this time, you’ll have a chance to help the Alaska Public Interest Research Group (AKPIRG) raise awareness of the harm the state is doing by allowing Hilcorp to keep its secrets. AKPIRG is planning a public rally at the courthouse at noon on the 27th, ahead of the hearing at 1:30pm. You can help prepare with a screen printing and banner making event on June 26 at the AKPIRG office at 2522 Arctic Boulevard in Anchorage.

If you can’t make it to the hearing in Anchorage, you can livestream the City of Valdez v. Regulatory Commission of Alaska, et al. hearing. For more information on the case and its consequences, you can watch this info session with AKPIRG’s energy experts Alyssa Sappenfield and Phil Wight. 

Similar Posts

Before AK LNG Asks for Tax Breaks, They Need to Stop Hiding Its Costs

Governor Mike Dunleavy has said he plans to introduce legislation to give the AKLNG project a 90% break on the property taxes that help fund local schools, roads, and emergency services. Consultants, too, give legislators a hard sell on the need for tax breaks and other “risk sharing” between the project and the state. We need to know: if the legendary gasline were built, what would we in south central Alaska be paying for North Slope gas?

The “Big, Beautiful Cook Inlet” (BBC1): March Lease Sales Move Forward without New Environmental Reviews

Instead of conducting updated environmental analysis, on the BBC1 lease sale the administration indicated it would rely on reviews completed in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Inletkeeper has joined with community and environmental groups to formally notify Interior Secretary Doug Burgum of their intent to sue if the sale proceeds without required consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Relying on outdated reports disregards nearly a decade worth of analysis on the accelerating impacts of climate change, increased industrial activity, and updated science on species and habitat conditions.