Donate

The Donlin Gold Mine Gas Pipeline

Clean Water, Donlin Gold Mine, Energy & Alaska, Healthy Habitat

Act NOW to Protect Salmon Habitat – Comments Due March 22 BACKGROUND:  The proposed Donlin mine along the banks of the Kuskokwim River in southwest Alaska would be a massive […]

Act NOW to Protect Salmon Habitat – Comments Due March 22

BACKGROUND:  The proposed Donlin mine along the banks of the Kuskokwim River in southwest Alaska would be a massive open gold mine.  To power the facility, Donlin plans a 315 mile-long natural gas pipeline from Cook Inlet through the Skwentna, Yentna and  Kuskokwim drainages. These areas support important subsistence, sport and personal use fish and game resources, and feed commercial fisheries downstream. This pipeline would trench through hundreds of salmon streams, draw from over 45 new sand/gravel pits, and open a new 150 foot-wide corridor connecting southcentral and southwestern Alaska.

TAKE ACTION:  The Alaska DNR is now taking comments on the right-of-way (ROW) lease needed to cross approximately 207 miles of state lands along the 315 mile-long corridor.  Donlin consultants found fish in 174 of 576 streams to be crossed, though that number is likely low. The law says DNR must find Donlin can “prevent any significant adverse environmental impact, including but not limited to … damage to fish and wildlife and their habitat.” AS 38.35.100(a)(3).  ADFG, however, notes stream crossing may cause increased sedimentation, bank erosion, migration disruption, fish egg mortality, loss of habitat and changes to overwintering areas. DNR says Donlin will address the details around fish and fish habitat protection later in the permitting process, but that makes little sense when the law says DNR must show it can protect natural resources as a condition of receiving the ROW authorization. To date, the state has ignored requests from Tribes for consultations prior to the issuance of the ROW and other significant permits and authorizations.

TALKING POINTS:

  • The State should engage all Tribes potentially affected by the gas pipeline in meaningful consultations prior to issuing a ROW lease;
  • The State should require the completion of Title 16/Fish Habitat Permits prior to the issuance of the ROW lease to ensure the protection of salmon and other fish species.

COMMENTS DUE: March 22, 2019 by 5:00 PM to:

State Pipeline Coordinator’s Section

3651 Penland Parkway, Anchorage, AK 99508

Ph: 907.269.6479; Fx: 907.269.6880

Email: spco.records@alaska.gov

PUBLIC MEETINGS:

  • McGrath Community Center, February 27, 2019, 4:00-6:00pm
  • Tyonek Tribal Center, February 28, 2019, 1:00-2:00pm
  • Bethel Cultural Center, March 4, 2019, 6:00-8:00pm
  • Aniak Community Center, March 6, 2019, 7:00-9:00pm
  • Anchorage (Atwood Conf. Center), March 12, 2019, 5:30-7:30pm
  • Skwentna Roadhouse, March 13, 2019, 11:00am-1:00pm

For more information, contact: Bob Shavelson, bob@inletkeeper.org

Similar Posts

What’s Next for Planned Offshore Lease Sales in Lower Cook Inlet

by | Feb 5, 2026 | , , ,

Last year, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) prematurely scrapped an offshore management plan that protected Alaskan coastal waters from oil and gas leasing. Now, the agency is planning multiple leases for Lower Cook Inlet in their new 5-year plan. It’s vital that we continue to speak up for our coastal ecosystems, sustainable fisheries, and what’s best for our local economies. Learn what happens next.

Offshore drilling is political theatre, not an energy solution

by | Jan 22, 2026 | , ,

As the Cook Inlet gas we’ve historically relied on for heat and electricity becomes more expensive and precarious, the Trump administration is offering a golden chance to prolong our dependence, spend more on energy, and create a long-term drag on our economy by doubling down on what isn’t working. What’s the price of this opportunity? Only a 1-in-5 risk of major oil spills, which increases with each new piece of extraction infrastructure. The art of the deal!

Not interested? Well, it’s your lucky day. BOEM is signing you up anyway.

We can’t risk turning climate pollution into water pollution

by | Jan 19, 2026 | ,

Carbon capture has a host of uncertainties upstream of the injection well. But let’s set aside for now the unsolved technological question of how CO2 can be affordably captured at any significant scale. Likewise the economic and political questions of how to price and/or police carbon to make polluters capture it. What concerns do we have about pumping CO2 underground, and the vigilance needed to be sure it doesn’t harm the people and ecosystems above?