Protect the Susitna Valley: Renewed Threat of Coalbed Methane Drilling

by | Sep 30, 2024 | Mining, Coalbed Methane, Oil & Gas, West Su Access Road

The State must evaluate the costs of any gas exploration project alongside other major proposed developments, including the West Susitna Industrial Access Corridor, Donlin Right of Way, Susitna Coal and Carbon Capture project, and proposed pipeline extensions, to fully understand the full breadth of impact to the Susitna Watershed.

Protect the Susitna Valley:
Renewed Threat of Coalbed Methane Drilling

— Loren Barrett

 

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources is once again considering a proposal to open 1.5 million undeveloped acres of the Susitna Valley for gas exploration—a decision that could threaten salmon habitat, wetlands, and local recreation. This solicitation area, once considered for coalbed methane drilling, poses severe threats to our fish, wildlife, and outdoor recreation opportunities.

If approved, the license allows for unrestricted exploration for ten years across an area whose boundaries are ill-defined in the current proposal and includes critical salmon spawning habitat, prime moose habitat, as well as key recreation areas like Nancy Lakes State Recreation Area, Willow Creek, and the Deshka River. 

The State must evaluate the costs of any gas exploration project alongside other major proposed developments, including the West Susitna Industrial Access Corridor, Donlin Right of Way, Susitna Coal and Carbon Capture project, and proposed pipeline extensions, to fully understand the full breadth of impact to the Susitna Watershed.

In 2017, public opposition was strong, with 92% of comments against the proposal due to ecological, social, and economic concerns. Every comment counts. Submit your comment by 5pm on Oct 7th to dog.bif@alaska.gov to safeguard the Susitna Valley’s future for fish, wildlife, and people.

 Solicitation Area Boundary Map & How to Submit Comments

Similar Posts

Offshore drilling is political theatre, not an energy solution

As the Cook Inlet gas we’ve historically relied on for heat and electricity becomes more expensive and precarious, the Trump administration is offering a golden chance to prolong our dependence, spend more on energy, and create a long-term drag on our economy by doubling down on what isn’t working. What’s the price of this opportunity? Only a 1-in-5 risk of major oil spills, which increases with each new piece of extraction infrastructure. The art of the deal!

Not interested? Well, it’s your lucky day. BOEM is signing you up anyway.

We can’t risk turning climate pollution into water pollution

Carbon capture has a host of uncertainties upstream of the injection well. But let’s set aside for now the unsolved technological question of how CO2 can be affordably captured at any significant scale. Likewise the economic and political questions of how to price and/or police carbon to make polluters capture it. What concerns do we have about pumping CO2 underground, and the vigilance needed to be sure it doesn’t harm the people and ecosystems above?