On the Anniversary of the Exxon Valdez, Cook Inlet Oil & Gas Shows Continued Complacency

by | Jun 10, 2017 | Energy & Alaska

March 24 marks 28 years since the Exxon Valdez “fetched up, ah, hard aground” on Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound, laying a path of destruction across Alaska’s coastal ecosystems […]

March 24 marks 28 years since the Exxon Valdez “fetched up, ah, hard aground” on Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound, laying a path of destruction across Alaska’s coastal ecosystems and the countless lives they support. While Exxon officials worked hard to convince the world it spilled “only” 10.8 million gallons of crude—ostensibly to pay lower penalties—the real volume was probably at least double. Today, Exxon crude still lingers throughout the Sound’s intertidal areas.

The Alaska Oil Spill Commission and the U.S. Congress both concluded that a creeping complacency lead to the Exxon Valdez spill. Since then, oil spill prevention and response have become heightened priorities in Prince William Sound.

Cook Inlet, however, is a different story. It started in 1956, when ARCO geologist Bill Bishop famously stomped his boot into the ground near the Swanson River (in what’s now the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge), and said “drill here,” leading to the first commercial oil discovery in the state. Development soon moved offshore, with a host of platforms, pipelines and processing facilities crisscrossing Cook Inlet by the mid-1960’s.

Similar Posts

Su Dam: A Bad Idea Remains Bad

The Su Dam is not the answer to Alaska’s growing energy crisis. Today, solar power generation is the fastest type of energy infrastructure to build, and wind farms are expected to play a massive role in Alaska’s future energy grid. But with political winds shifting against renewables for now, Homer Electric Association (HEA) is pursuing ill-conceived hydro power projects, despite the damage they could cause to our home, our economy, and our salmon.

Alaska Energy Burden Report

Alaskans – especially low-income, rural, and Indigenous communities – face some of the highest energy burdens in the U.S., spending a disproportionate share of their income on energy costs. These high costs pose a threat to financial stability, health, and cultural practices. The report identifies major disparities and outlines targeted, community-driven solutions to reduce these burdens and promote energy sovereignty.